FEMA Trailer Formaldehyde Litigation Group
 

Toxic Trailer Litigation
Informational Website

   Home
   About the Firms
Press Reports « Back to Previous Page
Congress names names in FEMA trailer probe

House Democrats say manufacturers knew of high formaldehyde levels

By Mike Brunker
Projects Team editor
MSNBC
updated 5:42 p.m. CT, Wed., July. 9, 2008

Congressional Democrats for the first time named names Wednesday in their investigation of formaldehyde-contaminated travel trailers provided by FEMA to victims of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, charging that manufacturers knew but did not disclose that the units were emitting high levels of the toxic gas that could sicken inhabitants.

From left, Gulf Stream Coach Chairman Kim Shea, Pilgrim International President Steve Bennet, Keystone RV President Ronald Fenech and Forest River President and CEO Peter Liegl faced tough questions from congressional Democrats Wednesday about the high levels of formaldehyde found in travel trailers provided to victims of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita by FEMA.

At a contentious hearing before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Rep. Henry Waxman of California and other Democrats grilled officials of four companies — Gulf Stream Coach Inc.; Pilgrim International Inc.; Keystone RV Inc.; and Forest River Inc. — whose trailers were found to have the highest levels of formaldehyde in testing by the federal Centers for Disease Control.

Waxman, the committee chairman, said all four companies should have known that their products contained potentially dangerous levels of formaldehyde, the airborne form of a chemical used in a wide variety of products, including composite wood and plywood panels.

But he saved his sharpest criticism for Gulf Stream, of Nappanee, Ind., which provided the Federal Emergency Management Agency with 50,000 travel trailers under two contracts worth a total of $50 million.

He said that documents reviewed by committee staff indicated the company found high levels of formaldehyde in its trailers in testing conducted in early 2006, but viewed the results as a public relations liability instead of a health hazard and failed to inform FEMA.

Letter put positive spin on test results
Waxman cited a May 11, 2006, letter in which a Gulf Stream executive assured FEMA that “our informal testing has indicated that formaldehyde levels of indoor ambient air of occupied trailers fall below, for instance, the OSHA standard of .75 parts per million.”

The letter did not, however, reveal that the tests found formaldehyde levels of 100 parts per billion or higher — the level at which acute adverse health effects begin — in every one of the 11 occupied Gulf Stream travel trailers that were tested. In four of the trailers, the levels were higher than 500 ppb — the exposure level at which the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration requires mandatory medical monitoring for workers.

“The company did test trailers,” Waxman said. “.. It found pervasive contamination and it didn’t tell anyone.”

Gulf Stream Chairman Jim Shea responded that the company conducted only informal tests of the trailers that did not produce reliable results. He also said the company offered to share the results with FEMA and to participate in further testing.

“FEMA did not accept,” he said.

Republicans on the committee rallied to defend the manufacturers, noting that federal agencies never set federal guidelines for formaldehyde exposure in travel trailers.

‘Confusion ... not some conspiracy’
“The problem was and is confusion among government agencies, not some conspiracy by trailer manufacturers,” said Rep. Tom Davis of Virginia, the committee’s ranking Republican.

Nakeva Narcisse and daughter Asanta Mackey, 5, sit inside their FEMA trailer outside Port Sulphur, La., on May 31. Narcisse said her daughter has had a persistent cough and other ailments since they moved into the trailer.

FEMA officials did not testify at Wednesday’s hearing, having informed the committee that they were busy providing aid to victims of recent Midwest flooding, according to Waxman. At a hearing last year, the committee revealed documents showing that FEMA lawyers resisted conducting formaldehyde tests out of concern that it “would imply FEMA’s ownership of the issue.” Representatives of FEMA did not return a call from msnbc.com seeking comment.

The hearing was the second held by the committee in an effort to determine why the travel trailers contained such high levels of formaldehyde. The gaseous form of the chemical can cause a variety of immediate ailments, such as coughing, bloody noses and burning eyes, and also is considered a human carcinogen, or cancer-causing substance, by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and a probable human carcinogen by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Hurricane victims still occupy approximately 15,000 FEMA travel trailers on the Gulf Coast, down from 143,000 at the height of the emergency shelter program. All told, FEMA spent approximately $2 billion to purchase more than 120,000 travel trailers for use as temporary housing.

Waxman suggested that the government should try to recoup some of that money in light of the fact that FEMA began moving residents out of the travel trailers in February after the CDC testing found potentially hazardous levels of formaldehyde gas in both travel trailers and mobile homes provided by the agency.

‘Some responsibility for the manufacturers’
“I think when we have to abandon trailers, it’s not just the government that should pay for it,” he said. “I think there’s some responsibility for the manufacturers themselves.”

Though it’s unlikely that the manufacturers would be forced to repay the government in the absence of a standard for formaldehyde in travel trailers, they are facing a more serious financial threat. The four companies represented at Wednesday’s hearing are among the dozens of manufacturers named in a class-action lawsuit accusing them of ignoring the health risks by using products containing high levels of formaldehyde.

There is no government standard for the amount of formaldehyde in travel trailers. The government sets standards for indoor air quality for materials used to build mobile homes, but not for travel trailers. If the government were to set a standard for materials in travel trailers, the order would have to come from Congress.

Until experts determine a safe level of formaldehyde, FEMA has set its own formaldehyde standard at 16 ppb. The manufacturers said such a low threshold would be impossible to assure and would preclude them from bidding on government contracts for emergency housing.

© MSNBC Interactive

 

« Back to Previous Page
 Press Reports
 Case Documents
 Government Investigation
 Counsel Press Releases
 Claim Office Contact Info
 FAQ

Symptoms of Formaldehyde Exposure:

Asthma Attacks
Blurred Vision
Eye irritiation
Shortness of Breath
Sinus Infections
Skin rashes
Coughing
Dizziness
Headaches
Nausea
Nosebleeds
Wheezing
Formaldehyde has been classified as a human carcinogen (cancer-causing substance) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and as a probable human carcinogen by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

What is Formaldehyde?

Formaldehyde is an important industrial chemical used to make other chemicals, building materials, and household products. It is one of the large family of chemical compounds called volatile organic compounds or 'VOCs'. The term volatile means that the compounds vaporize, that is, become a gas, at normal room temperatures.

What are the short-term health effects of formaldehyde exposure?

When formaldehyde is present in the air at levels exceeding 0.1 ppm, some individuals may experience health effects such as watery eyes; burning sensations of the eyes, nose, and throat; coughing; wheezing; nausea; and skin irritation. Some people are very sensitive to formaldehyde, while others have no reaction to the same level of exposure.

Can formaldehyde cause cancer?


Although the short-term health effects of formaldehyde exposure are well known, less is known about its potential long-term health effects. In 1980, laboratory studies showed that exposure to formaldehyde could cause nasal cancer in rats. This finding raised the question of whether formaldehyde exposure could also cause cancer in humans. In 1987, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classified formaldehyde as a probable human carcinogen under conditions of unusually high or prolonged exposure (1). Since that time, some studies of industrial workers have suggested that formaldehyde exposure is associated with nasal cancer and nasopharyngeal cancer, and possibly with leukemia. In 1995, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) concluded that formaldehyde is a probable human carcinogen. However, in a reevaluation of existing data in June 2004, the IARC reclassified formaldehyde as a known human carcinogen (2).
© Website Hosting and Design by HigherGround Media Design for Tony Buzbee Law firm - all rights reserved.  
http://www.formaldehydetrailer.com http://www.katrinatrailerscase.com
http://www.sicktrailercaes.com http://www.sicktrailercase.com
http://www.toxictrailerlitigation.com http://www.toxictrailerscase.com
http://www.toxixtrailerscase.com http://www.trailercases.com